Live facial recognition technology or automatic facial recognition AFR adds another dimension to CCTV monitoring and other surveillance methods. Using biometrics certain physical and physiological features , the technology can map facial features to identify particular individuals by matching these with a database of known faces. This technology has been in use for some years by certain public and government agencies, but with the advent of AI and machine learning, it has become more prevalent in the private sector. You are walking along a side street towards your office. Unbeknown to you a closed-circuit television with facial recognition capabilities is tracking your movements. Is this lawful? Ms Denham has also recently released statements addressing police and private use of facial recognition.
The Internet Newsletter for Lawyers is edited by Nick Holmes
To browse Academia. Skip to main content. You're using an out-of-date version of Internet Explorer. Log In Sign Up. Fahad Nabeel. Despite its advantages, made use of by the common man on a day-to-day basis, individuals and entities with malicious intent have projected the darker side of technology by exploiting the vulnerabilities of technological advancements; owing to the ease in commutation, communication and access. Contrasting both aspects, the article discusses how facial recognition technology FRT should be regulated legally in a way that bene ts of this technology can be harnessed while addressing concerns related to the probable abuses of the technology. In simple terms, FRT refers to the ability of computer software to identify speci c human faces in photos or videos. Using cloud infrastructure, FRT can identify and log facial details of individuals to process images from a computer, smartphone, or a camera.
The EU could temporarily ban the use of facial recognition technology in public places such as train stations, sport stadiums and shopping centres over fears about creeping surveillance of European citizens. A prohibition lasting between three and five years is seen as a way for Brussels to manage the risks said to be posed by the breakneck speed at which the software is being adopted. The option is contained in an early draft of a European commission white paper obtained by the news website Euractiv. The final version is due to be published in February as part of a wider overhaul of the regulation of artificial intelligence. Critics claim Brussels is overly cautious in its treatment of new developments.
The European Union is debating a potential ban on the use of facial recognition technologies in public areas. Facial recognition-equipped systems, such as those found in mobile devices and cameras, are advocated by law enforcement as a way to track missing persons and as useful tools in criminal investigations. However, critics say this technology is susceptible to abuse and its use without the consent of the general public undermines our right to privacy. As the development of facial recognition technologies gains traction, lawmakers have been left with the task of working out how to control its use. The EU, as reported by Reuters , is considering a ban of up to five years on facial recognition in public areas -- potentially including locations such as parks, tourist hotspots, and sports venues -- to give politicians time to thrash out legislation to prevent its abuse. The proposals, as seen by the publication, are part of an page whitepaper that suggests a ban could permit the time to create a "sound methodology for assessing the impacts of this technology and possible risk management measures. However, exceptions could be made to a blanket ban for the purposes of security and research.